Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.405 vs $0.676. GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) lebih cepat di 7.11s vs 43.12s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 69.7% vs 71.2%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGPT-5.6 Terra (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 6.1x faster than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra medium Rilis: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 7.8 7.8
Peringkat #46 #44
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.3 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 69.7% 71.2%
Tes tidak stabil 2 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 4.825 1.514
Total Biaya $0.676 $0.405
Harga input $2.500 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Harga output $15.000 / 1M $1.950 / 1M
Total token input 79,175 97,689
Token output 4,878 6,412
Token penalaran 26,952 184,825
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 7.11s 43.12s
Waktu respons (maks) 41.68s 291.55s
Waktu respons (total) 156.42s 905.53s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#46 GPT-5.6 Terra

medium
Biaya
$0.035
Waktu
16.3s
Token
2,418 tok

#44 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Biaya
$0.024
Waktu
219.0s
Token
12,235 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.1 7.2 55.6% 1 7.19s 7,302 427 4,527
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan