- Peringkat
- #181
- Total token output
- 186,901
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 97.34s
- Total Biaya
- $3.264
Ember-1 (max) vs GPT-5.5
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.7 vs 6.6. GPT-5.5 memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $1.212 vs $3.264. GPT-5.5 lebih cepat di 4.75s vs 97.34s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 59.4% vs 56.5%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #185
- Total token output
- 6,197
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 4.75s
- Total Biaya
- $1.212
Model yang direkomendasikan
GPT-5.5
It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 2.7x less than Ember-1 (max).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ember-1 Ember-1 max | GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Peringkat | #181 | #185 |
| Keandalan | 8.3 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.8 | 9.3 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 59.4% | 56.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 2 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 29.671 | 10.096 |
| Total Biaya | $3.264 | $1.212 |
| Harga input | $3.000 / 1M | $5.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $15.000 / 1M | $30.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 153,399 | 205,108 |
| Token output | 7,803 | 6,197 |
| Token penalaran | 179,098 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 97.34s | 4.75s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 587.08s | 57.53s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 2238.73s | 109.31s |
| Parameter | ~2.8T total (~104B aktif) | ~1.5T total (~100B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#181 Ember-1
max- Biaya
- $0.163
- Waktu
- 229.4s
- Token
- 11,002 tok
#185 GPT-5.5
none- Biaya
- $0.090
- Waktu
- 54.3s
- Token
- 3,063 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ember-1maxvsGPT 5.3 ChatnoneEmber-1maxvsMiniMax M3mediumGPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.3 FlashlowEmber-1maxvsGPT-5.6 SolnoneEmber-1maxvsGrok 4.7highEmber-1maxvsSolar Pro 4lowEmber-1maxvsQwen3.5-FlashnoneGPT-5.5nonevsQwen3.7 FlashmediumEmber-1maxvsGLM 5.3 FlashlowMiniMax M3mediumvsGPT-5.5noneGPT-5.5nonevsGrok 4.7highLongCat 2.0lowvsGPT-5.5none