- Peringkat
- #157
- Total token output
- 56,766
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 34.90s
- Total Biaya
- $1.488
Ember-1 (low) vs MiMo-V2.5 (medium)
MiMo-V2.5 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.1 vs 7.0. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.419 vs $1.488. Ember-1 (low) lebih cepat di 34.90s vs 49.20s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 65.2% vs 69.6%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #152
- Total token output
- 341,511
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 49.20s
- Total Biaya
- $0.419
Model yang direkomendasikan
MiMo-V2.5 (medium)
It has the best score here (7.1), while costing about 3.6x less than Ember-1 (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ember-1 Ember-1 low | MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.0 | 7.1 |
| Peringkat | #157 | #152 |
| Keandalan | 8.8 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.2 | 7.6 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 65.2% | 69.6% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 7 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 11.441 | 3.491 |
| Total Biaya | $1.488 | $0.419 |
| Harga input | $3.000 / 1M | $0.140 / 1M |
| Harga output | $15.000 / 1M | $0.280 / 1M |
| Total token input | 211,908 | 259,664 |
| Token output | 14,158 | 8,414 |
| Token penalaran | 42,608 | 333,097 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 34.90s | 49.20s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 121.29s | 316.27s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 802.79s | 1131.69s |
| Parameter | ~2.8T total (~104B aktif) | 310B total (15B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#157 Ember-1
low- Biaya
- $0.016
- Waktu
- 24.2s
- Token
- 1,165 tok
#152 MiMo-V2.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 54.8s
- Token
- 5,247 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ember-1lowvsKimi K2.7 CodemediumEmber-1lowvsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumEmber-1lowvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumEmber-1lowvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneClaude Opus 5nonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumEmber-1lowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumEmber-1lowvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumGrok 4.6lowvsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowvsMiMo-V2.5mediumStep 3.7 FlashlowvsMiMo-V2.5mediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsMiMo-V2.5medium