- Peringkat
- #163
- Total token output
- 121,223
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 58.14s
- Total Biaya
- $2.405
Ember-1 (high) vs Grok 4.6 (low)
Grok 4.6 (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.9 vs 6.9. Grok 4.6 (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.781 vs $2.405. Grok 4.6 (low) lebih cepat di 16.44s vs 58.14s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 71.0% vs 66.7%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #159
- Total token output
- 42,315
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 16.44s
- Total Biaya
- $0.781
Model yang direkomendasikan
Grok 4.6 (low)
It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 3.1x less than Ember-1 (high).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ember-1 Ember-1 high | Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.9 | 6.9 |
| Peringkat | #163 | #159 |
| Keandalan | 8.6 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 71.0% | 66.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 8 | 1 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 20.041 | 5.205 |
| Total Biaya | $2.405 | $0.781 |
| Harga input | $3.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $15.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 195,489 | 263,427 |
| Token output | 12,475 | 6,006 |
| Token penalaran | 108,748 | 36,309 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 58.14s | 16.44s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 255.06s | 57.97s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1337.19s | 378.14s |
| Parameter | ~2.8T total (~104B aktif) | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#163 Ember-1
high- Biaya
- $0.038
- Waktu
- 55.1s
- Token
- 2,671 tok
#159 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6
low- Biaya
- $0.011
- Waktu
- 26.0s
- Token
- 1,941 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsGrok 4.6lowEmber-1highvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumEmber-1highvsGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisEmber-1highvsGPT-5.6 LunalowClaude Sonnet 5.5lowvsEmber-1highClaude Opus 4.8nonevsEmber-1highEmber-1highvsKimi K2.6mediumKimi K2.7 CodemediumvsGrok 4.6lowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6lowEmber-1highvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsGrok 4.6lowEmber-1highvsInklinglowTersedia gratis