- Peringkat
- #163
- Total token output
- 121,223
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 58.14s
- Total Biaya
- $2.405
Ember-1 (high) vs Kimi K2.6 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.9 vs 6.8. Kimi K2.6 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $1.323 vs $2.405. Ember-1 (high) lebih cepat di 58.14s vs 121.25s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 71.0% vs 60.9%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #168
- Total token output
- 396,671
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 121.25s
- Total Biaya
- $1.323
Model yang direkomendasikan
Kimi K2.6 (medium)
It has the best score here (6.8), while costing about 1.8x less than Ember-1 (high).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ember-1 Ember-1 high | Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.9 | 6.8 |
| Peringkat | #163 | #168 |
| Keandalan | 8.6 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 71.0% | 60.9% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 8 | 4 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 20.041 | 12.282 |
| Total Biaya | $2.405 | $1.323 |
| Harga input | $3.000 / 1M | $0.650 / 1M |
| Harga output | $15.000 / 1M | $3.410 / 1M |
| Total token input | 195,489 | 226,880 |
| Token output | 12,475 | 65,346 |
| Token penalaran | 108,748 | 331,325 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 58.14s | 121.25s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 255.06s | 876.20s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1337.19s | 2667.55s |
| Parameter | ~2.8T total (~104B aktif) | 1T total (32B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Bobot tersedia |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#163 Ember-1
high- Biaya
- $0.038
- Waktu
- 55.1s
- Token
- 2,671 tok
#168 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6
medium- Biaya
- $0.013
- Waktu
- 103.4s
- Token
- 3,620 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ember-1highvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumEmber-1highvsGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisEmber-1highvsGPT-5.6 LunalowKimi K2.6mediumvsInklinglowTersedia gratisClaude Sonnet 5.5lowvsEmber-1highClaude Opus 4.8nonevsEmber-1highClaude Opus 4.8nonevsKimi K2.6mediumClaude Sonnet 5.5lowvsKimi K2.6mediumKimi K2.6mediumvsGPT-5.6 LunalowKimi K2.6mediumvsGPT-6 SolnoneEmber-1highvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumEmber-1highvsInklinglowTersedia gratis