#66 Seed-2.0-Mini
medium- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 161.7s
- Token
- 4,379 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
GPT-5.6 Luna (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.7 vs 7.4. Seed-2.0-Mini (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.044 vs $0.924. GPT-5.6 Luna (high) lebih cepat di 18.39s vs 80.22s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 57.1% vs 71.4%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Seed-2.0-Mini Seed-2.0-Mini medium | GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.4 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #66 | #52 |
| Keandalan | 6.7 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 57.1% | 71.4% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 3 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.397 | 6.594 |
| Total Biaya | $0.044 | $0.924 |
| Harga input | $0.100 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.400 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 41,904 | 35,699 |
| Token output | 2,555 | 2,079 |
| Token penalaran | 95,974 | 145,816 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 80.22s | 18.39s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 262.83s | 111.09s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1363.72s | 386.24s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Mini | 5.5 | 9.8 | 33.3% | 0 | 220.48s | 3,823 | 464 | 34,964 | |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | 5.5 | 4.7 | 55.6% | 2 | 15.63s | 7,302 | 510 | 17,746 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan