Navigasi
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash (medium)

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.3 vs 8.2. Gemini 2.5 Flash (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.644 vs $1.069. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh) lebih cepat di 13.17s vs 21.14s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 78.8% vs 71.2%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-29

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#79
Total token output
77,105
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
13.17s
Total Biaya
$1.069
Peringkat
#83
Total token output
241,365
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
21.14s
Total Biaya
$0.644
Model yang direkomendasikan Gemini 2.5 Flash (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.2 vs 8.3), while costing about 1.7x less than Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh Rilis: 2026-09-29 Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Rilis: 2025-06-17
Skor 8.3 8.2
Peringkat #79 #83
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.7 9.6
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 78.8% 71.2%
Tes tidak stabil 4 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 7.123 4.288
Total Biaya $1.069 $0.644
Harga input $2.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Harga output $10.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total token input 148,643 132,507
Token output 9,700 12,739
Token penalaran 67,405 228,626
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 13.17s 21.14s
Waktu respons (maks) 54.91s 140.50s
Waktu respons (total) 289.67s 465.10s
Parameter ~1T total (~100B aktif) ~350B total (~20B aktif)
Ketersediaan Tertutup Tertutup

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#79 Claude Sonnet 5.5

xhigh
Biaya
$0.319
Waktu
258.6s
Token
31,969 tok

#83 Gemini 2.5 Flash

medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
274.0s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Claude Sonnet 5.5 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 11.90s 10,608 555 9,501
Gemini 2.5 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 41.01s 6,669 543 32,303

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan