- Rank
- #115
- Total Output Tokens
- 306,044
- Response Time (avg)
- 68.44s
- Total Cost
- $2.996
Grok 4.5 (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)
GLM 5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 8.2 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.007 vs $2.996. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 26.88s vs 68.44s, with pass rates of 79.7% vs 81.2%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #91
- Total Output Tokens
- 81,020
- Response Time (avg)
- 26.88s
- Total Cost
- $1.007
Recommended model
GLM 5.2 (medium)
It has the best score here (8.2), while costing about 3.0x less than Grok 4.5 (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 medium | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Rank | #115 | #91 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Consistency | 9.0 | 8.1 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 66/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 79.7% | 81.2% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 14.430 | 2.890 |
| Total Cost | $2.996 | $1.007 |
| Input Price | $2.000 / 1M | $0.153 / 1M |
| Output Price | $6.000 / 1M | $12.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | $0.300 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 308,369 | 227,164 |
| Output Tokens | 7,013 | 20,029 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 299,031 | 60,991 |
| Response Time (avg) | 68.44s | 26.88s |
| Response Time (max) | 436.38s | 102.40s |
| Response Time (total) | 1574.14s | 591.34s |
| Parameters | ~1.7T total (~170B active) | 744B total (40B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#115 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
medium- Cost
- $0.044
- Time
- 59.4s
- Tokens
- 7,512 tok
#91 GLM 5.2
medium- Cost
- $0.041
- Time
- 195.8s
- Tokens
- 9,287 tok
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Grok 4.5mediumvsGLM 5.3highGrok 4.5highvsGLM 5.2mediumLing 3.1 FlashhighvsGrok 4.5mediumMuse WondermaxvsGrok 4.5mediumQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.5mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5mediumKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2mediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsGrok 4.5mediumGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Haiku 5.5highvsGLM 5.2mediumGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGrok 4.5medium