- Rank
- #154
- Total Output Tokens
- 306,044
- Response Time (avg)
- 68.44s
- Total Cost
- $2.996
Grok 4.5 (medium) vs Grok 4.6 (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. Grok 4.6 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $2.270 vs $2.996. Grok 4.5 (medium) is faster at 68.44s vs 74.77s, with pass rates of 79.7% vs 78.3%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #157
- Total Output Tokens
- 266,197
- Response Time (avg)
- 74.77s
- Total Cost
- $2.270
Recommended model
Grok 4.6 (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 medium | Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Rank | #154 | #157 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 79.7% | 78.3% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 14.430 | 14.187 |
| Total Cost | $2.996 | $2.270 |
| Input Price | $2.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $6.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | $0.300 / 1M | $0.500 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 308,369 | 336,351 |
| Output Tokens | 7,013 | 6,180 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 299,031 | 260,017 |
| Response Time (avg) | 68.44s | 74.77s |
| Response Time (max) | 436.38s | 514.35s |
| Response Time (total) | 1574.14s | 1719.73s |
| Parameters | ~1.7T total (~170B active) | ~1.7T total (~170B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#154 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
medium- Cost
- $0.044
- Time
- 59.4s
- Tokens
- 7,512 tok
#157 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6
medium- Cost
- $0.028
- Time
- 72.1s
- Tokens
- 4,771 tok
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Grok 4.5mediumvsGLM 5.3highDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017highvsGrok 4.5mediumGrok 4.6mediumvsGLM 5.3highLing 3.1 FlashhighvsGrok 4.5mediumMuse WondermaxvsGrok 4.5mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.6mediumQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.5mediumGrok 4.5mediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashX LegalmaxDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017highvsGrok 4.6mediumLing 3.1 FlashhighvsGrok 4.6mediumMuse WondermaxvsGrok 4.6mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5medium