Navigate
Advertise here

Grok 4.3 (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.0 vs 7.0. GLM 5.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.727 vs $0.741. Grok 4.3 (medium) is faster at 44.21s vs 58.80s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
225,904
Response Time (avg)
44.21s
Total Cost
$0.741
Rank
#142
Total Output Tokens
215,889
Response Time (avg)
58.80s
Total Cost
$0.727
Recommended model Grok 4.3 (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 medium Release: 2026-05-01 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 7.0 7.0
Rank #139 #142
Reliability 10.0 8.1
Consistency 8.2 8.4
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 65.2%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.168 6.923
Total Cost $0.741 $0.727
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 140,244 82,592
Output Tokens 13,739 16,089
Reasoning Tokens 212,165 199,800
Response Time (avg) 44.21s 58.80s
Response Time (max) 216.69s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 972.64s 1234.72s
Parameters ~1.5T total (~150B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#139 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.3

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
19.0s
Tokens
3,661 tok

#142 GLM 5.1

medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Grok 4.3 5.9 7.7 44.4% 1 41.23s 8,340 1,028 31,226
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

GPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGrok 4.3mediumMercury 2.5highvsGrok 4.3mediumGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-5.5nonevsGrok 4.3mediumSolar Pro 4highvsGrok 4.3mediumClaude Fable 5.1lowvsGLM 5.1mediumMercury 2.5highvsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1mediumStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGrok 4.3mediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGrok 4.3mediumSolar Pro 4highvsGLM 5.1medium