Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 27B (low) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low)

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low) leads on average score with 8.0 vs 7.6. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.045 vs ~$0.089. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low) is faster at 23.66s vs 46.60s, with pass rates of 68.1% vs 79.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#121
Total Output Tokens
209,143
Response Time (avg)
46.60s
Total Cost
~$0.089
Rank
#96
Total Output Tokens
135,295
Response Time (avg)
23.66s
Total Cost
~$0.045
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low)

It has the best score here (8.0), while costing about 2.0x less than Qwen3.8 27B (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B low Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next low Release: 2026-10-04
Score 7.6 8.0
Rank #121 #96
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.1% 79.7%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result ~0.589 ~0.299
Total Cost ~$0.089 ~$0.045
Input Price N/A N/A
Output Price N/A N/A
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 315,290 342,163
Output Tokens 1,607 1,518
Reasoning Tokens 207,536 133,777
Response Time (avg) 46.60s 23.66s
Response Time (max) 376.04s 166.72s
Response Time (total) 1071.83s 544.16s
Parameters 27.3B 180B total (6B active)
Availability Weights available Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 Qwen3.8 27B

low
Cost
~$0.003
Time
92.8s
Tokens
6,902 tok

#96 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

low
Cost
~$0.002
Time
47.2s
Tokens
5,270 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 140.92s 8,127 585 86,694
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 29.46s 8,127 397 24,147

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Gemini 3.8 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.4 NanomediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailablevsSpace Bunny AlphahighQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailablevsGLM 5.1mediumQwen3.8 Flash NextlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowNemotron 3 UltramediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.4 MinimediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.6 LunahighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailableGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowSeed-2.0-CodehighvsQwen3.8 27BlowFree Available