Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.8 27B (high) vs Grok 4.5 (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.4 vs 8.4. Local hardware cost was not measured, so cost comparisons are unavailable. Grok 4.5 (low) is faster at 16.17s vs 167.89s, with pass rates of 77.3% vs 77.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#42
Total Output Tokens
656,635
Response Time (avg)
167.89s
Total Cost
N/A
Rank
#40
Total Output Tokens
115,489
Response Time (avg)
16.17s
Total Cost
$0.945
Recommended model Grok 4.5 (low)

It has the best score here (8.4), while responding about 10.4x faster than Qwen3.8 27B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Release: 2026-08-14 Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 low Release: 2026-07-08
Score 8.4 8.4
Rank #42 #40
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 77.3% 77.3%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result N/A 5.901
Total Cost N/A $0.945
Input Price N/A $2.000 / 1M
Output Price N/A $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 100,179 125,605
Output Tokens 904 7,505
Reasoning Tokens 655,731 107,984
Response Time (avg) 167.89s 16.17s
Response Time (max) 640.85s 205.28s
Response Time (total) 3693.54s 355.67s
Parameters 27.3B ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Weights available Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#42 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Cost
N/A
Time
270.1s
Tokens
18,963 tok

#40 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
12.4s
Tokens
2,018 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335
Grok 4.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.72s 9,579 303 15,641

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair