Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.0. Inkling (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.006 vs $1.143. Inkling (high) is faster at 64.16s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 77.3%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Max Preview (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20 Inkling Inkling high Release: 2026-07-18
Score 8.4 8.0
Rank #19 #28
Reliability 9.9 9.8
Consistency 8.9 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 77.3%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.173 6.704
Total Cost $1.143 $1.006
Input Price $1.040 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $6.240 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,240 86,746
Output Tokens 5,098 6,055
Reasoning Tokens 164,842 220,791
Response Time (avg) 67.53s 64.16s
Response Time (max) 238.07s 327.51s
Response Time (total) 1485.64s 1411.59s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#19 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

#28 Thinking Machines: Inkling

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
32.2s
Tokens
1,275 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957
Inkling 8.5 10.0 66.7% 0 148.36s 7,374 430 78,982

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair