Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) vs GLM 5.3 Flash (high)

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. GLM 5.3 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.084 vs $0.858. GLM 5.3 Flash (high) is faster at 29.11s vs 45.45s, with pass rates of 68.1% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#123
Total Output Tokens
652,280
Response Time (avg)
45.45s
Total Cost
$0.858
Rank
#132
Total Output Tokens
99,340
Response Time (avg)
29.11s
Total Cost
$0.084
Recommended model GLM 5.3 Flash (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while costing about 10.3x less than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.3 Flash GLM 5.3 Flash high Release: 2026-08-26
Score 7.4 7.3
Rank #123 #132
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.3 8.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.1% 66.7%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 6.594 0.426
Total Cost $0.858 $0.084
Input Price $0.188 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $1.125 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 258,760 225,013
Output Tokens 22,221 12,197
Reasoning Tokens 630,059 87,143
Response Time (avg) 45.45s 29.11s
Response Time (max) 578.13s 163.41s
Response Time (total) 1045.45s 669.54s
Parameters ~35B total (~3B active) 320B total (18B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#123 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

#132 GLM 5.3 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
186.7s
Tokens
10,486 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967
GLM 5.3 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 19.62s 7,317 373 9,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1mediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashhighQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.7lowGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.3 FlashhighGrok 4.7mediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashhighQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsInkling SmallhighFree AvailableGemini 2.5 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashhighQwen3.6 PlusmediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashhighInklingmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.3 FlashhighGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashhighDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423nonevsQwen3.6 Flashmedium