Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 27B (medium) vs Inkling Small (medium)

Inkling Small (medium) leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.5. Inkling Small (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.117 vs $0.573. Inkling Small (medium) is faster at 6.27s vs 106.32s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 56.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#117
Total Output Tokens
274,192
Response Time (avg)
106.32s
Total Cost
$0.573
Rank
#112
Total Output Tokens
55,321
Response Time (avg)
6.27s
Total Cost
$0.117
Recommended model Inkling Small (medium)

It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 4.9x less than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20 Inkling Small Inkling Small medium Release: 2026-08-01
Score 6.5 6.6
Rank #117 #112
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.0 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 56.1%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.319 1.166
Total Cost $0.573 $0.117
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,167 100,246
Output Tokens 32,889 6,422
Reasoning Tokens 241,303 48,899
Response Time (avg) 106.32s 6.27s
Response Time (max) 1085.11s 17.26s
Response Time (total) 2339.12s 138.02s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#117 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

#112 Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
13.4s
Tokens
1,753 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367
Inkling Small 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 10.49s 7,374 434 13,783

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair