Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 27B (medium) vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.6. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.231 vs $0.680. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is faster at 7.82s vs 106.32s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 60.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#109
Total Output Tokens
274,192
Response Time (avg)
106.32s
Total Cost
$0.680
Rank
#107
Total Output Tokens
19,257
Response Time (avg)
7.82s
Total Cost
$0.231
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Max Preview

It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 2.9x less than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.5 6.6
Rank #109 #107
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.0 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 60.6%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.319 2.061
Total Cost $0.680 $0.231
Input Price $0.290 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $2.400 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,167 106,339
Output Tokens 32,889 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 241,303 0
Response Time (avg) 106.32s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 1085.11s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 2339.12s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#109 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

#107 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair