Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Compared models

GPT-5.5 (medium) vs GPT-5.4 (medium) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) vs Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) benchmark comparison: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) leads on Score with 9.2. GPT-5.5 (medium) leads on Reliability with 10.0. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) has the lowest Total Cost at $1.361. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is fastest at 7.61s.

Last updated at: 2026-08-07

Rank
#15
Total Output Tokens
124,436
Response Time (avg)
38.42s
Total Cost
$4.137
Rank
#29
Total Output Tokens
88,670
Response Time (avg)
23.10s
Total Cost
$1.533
Rank
#9
Total Output Tokens
97,958
Response Time (avg)
21.47s
Total Cost
$1.361
Rank
#23
Total Output Tokens
29,990
Response Time (avg)
7.61s
Total Cost
$1.477
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium)

It has the best score here (9.2), while costing about 1.8x less than the other models in this comparison.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 medium Release: 2026-04-24 GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 medium Release: 2026-03-05 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Release: 2026-02-19 Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16
Score 9.0 8.5 9.2 8.7
Rank #15 #29 #9 #23
Reliability 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.6 10.0 9.6
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 87.9% 77.3% 90.9% 83.3%
Flaky tests 3 4 0 1
Total Runs 66 66 66 66
Cost per result 22.980 10.220 6.801 8.201
Total Cost $4.137 $1.533 $1.361 $1.477
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M $2.000 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $15.000 / 1M $12.000 / 1M $25.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,659 81,127 92,287 145,252
Output Tokens 5,617 6,155 5,232 24,948
Reasoning Tokens 118,819 82,515 92,726 5,042
Response Time (avg) 38.42s 23.10s 21.47s 7.61s
Response Time (max) 332.10s 100.41s 88.68s 65.40s
Response Time (total) 845.35s 508.26s 322.08s 159.91s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#15 GPT-5.5

medium
Cost
$0.112
Time
71.9s
Tokens
3,807 tok

#29 GPT-5.4

medium
Cost
$0.214
Time
199.6s
Tokens
14,349 tok

#9 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

medium
Cost
$0.115
Time
87.2s
Tokens
9,629 tok

#23 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 59.77s 7,305 362 24,959
GPT-5.4 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 44.36s 7,305 433 24,216
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 7.9 9.9 66.7% 0 40.17s 8,124 435 41,247
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair