Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.5 vs 7.5. GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.138 vs $0.437. GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) is faster at 13.24s vs 89.19s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 71.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#62
Total Output Tokens
97,122
Response Time (avg)
13.24s
Total Cost
$0.138
Rank
#66
Total Output Tokens
260,704
Response Time (avg)
89.19s
Total Cost
$0.437
Recommended model GPT-5.4 Nano (medium)

It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 3.2x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano medium Release: 2026-03-17 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Release: 2026-02-15
Score 7.5 7.5
Rank #62 #66
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 71.2%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.150 3.348
Total Cost $0.138 $0.437
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $1.250 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 82,819 113,560
Output Tokens 7,100 9,823
Reasoning Tokens 90,022 250,881
Response Time (avg) 13.24s 89.19s
Response Time (max) 94.06s 304.85s
Response Time (total) 291.33s 1337.92s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#62 GPT-5.4 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.007
Time
24.6s
Tokens
4,943 tok

#66 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

medium
Cost
$0.011
Time
125.5s
Tokens
7,040 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 19.12s 7,305 516 20,778
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 6.6 7.1 44.4% 1 180.70s 6,950 420 80,595

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair