Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

GPT-5.4 (medium) leads on average score with 8.5 vs 8.4. Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.143 vs $1.533. GPT-5.4 (medium) is faster at 23.10s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 77.3% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.4 (medium)It has the best score here (8.5), while responding about 2.9x faster than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 medium Release: 2026-03-05 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.5 8.4
Rank #18 #19
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 77.3% 80.3%
Flaky tests 4 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 10.220 8.173
Total Cost $1.533 $1.143
Input Price $2.500 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 81,127 79,240
Output Tokens 6,155 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 82,515 164,842
Response Time (avg) 23.10s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 100.41s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 508.26s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#18 GPT-5.4

medium
Cost
$0.214
Time
199.6s
Tokens
14,349 tok

#19 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 44.36s 7,305 433 24,216
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair