Navigate
Advertise here

GPT-5.2 (medium) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.4 vs 8.4. MiMo-V2.6-Pro (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.477 vs $1.182. GPT-5.2 (medium) is faster at 28.51s vs 147.50s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 77.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-22

Compared models

Rank
#59
Total Output Tokens
71,252
Response Time (avg)
28.51s
Total Cost
$1.182
Rank
#61
Total Output Tokens
502,443
Response Time (avg)
147.50s
Total Cost
$0.477
Recommended model GPT-5.2 (medium)

It has the best score here (8.4), while responding about 5.2x faster than MiMo-V2.6-Pro (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 medium Release: 2025-12-11 MiMo-V2.6-Pro MiMo-V2.6-Pro medium Release: 2026-09-22
Score 8.4 8.4
Rank #59 #61
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 8.5 7.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 77.3%
Flaky tests 4 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.438 3.666
Total Cost $1.182 $0.477
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,013 90,486
Output Tokens 9,914 6,569
Reasoning Tokens 61,338 495,874
Response Time (avg) 28.51s 147.50s
Response Time (max) 116.86s 904.91s
Response Time (total) 456.13s 3245.08s
Parameters ~1.2T total (~80B active) 1.02T total (42B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#59 GPT-5.2

medium
Cost
$0.047
Time
49.2s
Tokens
3,396 tok

#61 MiMo-V2.6-Pro

medium
Cost
$0.012
Time
185.6s
Tokens
13,493 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.73s 7,302 511 11,912
MiMo-V2.6-Pro 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 150.44s 7,422 785 94,571

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair