Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 5

The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.7. GLM 5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.027 vs $0.133. GLM 5 is faster at 4.03s vs 19.57s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 42.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#201
Total Output Tokens
30,249
Response Time (avg)
19.57s
Total Cost
$0.133
Rank
#197
Total Output Tokens
1,989
Response Time (avg)
4.03s
Total Cost
$0.027
Recommended model GLM 5

It has the best score here (5.7), while costing about 5.1x less than Kimi K2.6.

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 none Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5 GLM 5 none Release: 2026-02-12
Score 5.7 5.7
Rank #201 #197
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.3
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 42.4%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 3.732 0.263
Total Cost $0.133 $0.027
Input Price $0.542 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Output Price $2.281 / 1M $1.920 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 116,983 37,135
Output Tokens 30,249 1,989
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 19.57s 4.03s
Response Time (max) 238.89s 11.07s
Response Time (total) 430.58s 56.37s
Parameters 1T total (32B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#201 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

none
Cost
$0.020
Time
127.4s
Tokens
4,429 tok

#197 GLM 5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
32.1s
Tokens
2,023 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 82.57s 5,986 14,754 0
GLM 5 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 5.12s 7,256 428 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair