Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kimi K2.5 (medium) vs GLM 5.1

GLM 5.1 leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.4. GLM 5.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.451 vs $0.841. GLM 5.1 is faster at 11.10s vs 125.76s, with pass rates of 60.9% vs 47.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#211
Total Output Tokens
241,096
Response Time (avg)
125.76s
Total Cost
$0.841
Rank
#203
Total Output Tokens
20,076
Response Time (avg)
11.10s
Total Cost
$0.451
Recommended model GLM 5.1

It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 1.9x less than Kimi K2.5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 6.4 6.5
Rank #211 #203
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 7.1 8.2
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.9% 47.8%
Flaky tests 8 5
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 6.085 3.478
Total Cost $0.841 $0.451
Input Price $0.450 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $2.250 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.070 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 292,271 258,956
Output Tokens 55,025 20,076
Reasoning Tokens 186,071 0
Response Time (avg) 125.76s 11.10s
Response Time (max) 566.79s 107.19s
Response Time (total) 2137.84s 255.39s
Parameters 1T total (32B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#211 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

#203 GLM 5.1

none
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair