Navigate
Advertise here

Muse Wonder (minimal) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (medium)

Muse Wonder (minimal) leads on average score with 9.1 vs 9.0. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.096 vs $1.639. Muse Wonder (minimal) is faster at 7.72s vs 30.42s, with pass rates of 76.8% vs 84.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-13

Compared models

Rank
#41
Total Output Tokens
34,224
Response Time (avg)
7.72s
Total Cost
$1.639
Rank
#43
Total Output Tokens
92,998
Response Time (avg)
30.42s
Total Cost
$1.096
Recommended model Muse Wonder (minimal)

It has the best score here (9.1), while responding about 3.9x faster than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Wonder Muse Wonder minimal Release: 2026-10-13 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) medium Release: 2026-09-07
Score 9.1 9.0
Rank #41 #43
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.8% 84.1%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 9.639 6.084
Total Cost $1.639 $1.096
Input Price $4.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $20.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.200 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 238,532 268,540
Output Tokens 9,812 7,499
Reasoning Tokens 24,412 85,499
Response Time (avg) 7.72s 30.42s
Response Time (max) 42.89s 168.09s
Response Time (total) 177.57s 699.68s
Parameters ~1T total (~50B active) 2.4T total (~100B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#41 Muse Wonder

minimal
Cost
$0.048
Time
15.1s
Tokens
2,488 tok

#43 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

medium
Cost
$0.036
Time
108.3s
Tokens
5,980 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Wonder 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 6.86s 7,401 809 7,336
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 45.74s 7,893 551 20,628

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Seed 2.1 TurbohighvsMuse WonderminimalMuse WonderminimalvsParetodefaultGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsMuse WonderminimalMuse WonderminimalvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumMuse WonderminimalvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Opus 5lowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsMuse WonderminimalGemini 3.6 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashmaxSeed 2.1 TurbohighvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)medium