Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.660 vs $1.152. Muse Spark 1.1 (medium) is faster at 23.35s vs 37.09s, with pass rates of 76.2% vs 77.8%.

Recommended modelMuse Spark 1.1 (medium)It has the best score here (8.9), while responding about 1.6x faster than GLM 5.2 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 medium Release: 2026-07-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.9 8.0
Rank #15 #35
Reliability 10.0 9.3
Consistency 9.2 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.2% 77.8%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 7.676 4.255
Total Cost $1.152 $0.660
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 59,928 34,993
Output Tokens 3,523 51,575
Reasoning Tokens 249,752 166,065
Response Time (avg) 23.35s 37.09s
Response Time (max) 165.38s 180.69s
Response Time (total) 490.40s 778.91s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#15 Muse Spark 1.1

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
29.2s
Tokens
5,774 tok

#35 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.66s 8,562 347 23,562
GLM 5.2 6.4 4.4 77.8% 2 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair