Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 8.9 vs 8.9. Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.960 vs $1.152. Muse Spark 1.1 (medium) is faster at 23.35s vs 59.63s, with pass rates of 76.2% vs 81.0%.

Recommended modelMuse Spark 1.1 (medium)It has the best score here (8.9), while responding about 2.6x faster than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 medium Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.9 8.9
Rank #15 #14
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.2% 81.0%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 7.676 7.024
Total Cost $1.152 $0.960
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 59,928 42,362
Output Tokens 3,523 2,273
Reasoning Tokens 249,752 144,367
Response Time (avg) 23.35s 59.63s
Response Time (max) 165.38s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 490.40s 1252.17s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#15 Muse Spark 1.1

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
29.2s
Tokens
5,774 tok

#14 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.66s 8,562 347 23,562
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair