Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.2. GPT-5.6 Terra (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.852 vs $1.152. GPT-5.6 Terra (high) is faster at 10.89s vs 23.35s, with pass rates of 76.2% vs 68.3%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 Terra (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.2 vs 8.9), while responding about 2.1x faster than Muse Spark 1.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 medium Release: 2026-07-16 GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra high Release: 2026-07-09
Score 8.9 8.2
Rank #15 #32
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.2% 68.3%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 7.676 6.086
Total Cost $1.152 $0.852
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $15.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 59,928 34,218
Output Tokens 3,523 1,908
Reasoning Tokens 249,752 49,189
Response Time (avg) 23.35s 10.89s
Response Time (max) 165.38s 91.49s
Response Time (total) 490.40s 228.65s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#15 Muse Spark 1.1

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
29.2s
Tokens
5,774 tok

#32 GPT-5.6 Terra

high
Cost
$0.055
Time
30.2s
Tokens
3,748 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.66s 8,562 347 23,562
GPT-5.6 Terra 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 9.14s 7,302 370 6,087

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair