Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Muse Spark 1.1 (high) vs GLM 5.2 (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.0 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.188 vs $1.709. Muse Spark 1.1 (high) is faster at 30.84s vs 69.86s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 69.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#52
Total Output Tokens
363,989
Response Time (avg)
30.84s
Total Cost
$1.709
Rank
#55
Total Output Tokens
364,655
Response Time (avg)
69.86s
Total Cost
$1.188
Recommended model Muse Spark 1.1 (high)

It has the best score here (8.0), while responding about 2.3x faster than GLM 5.2 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.0 8.0
Rank #52 #55
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.9 8.6
Attempts 64/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 69.7%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 64 66
Cost per result 14.236 6.849
Total Cost $1.709 $1.188
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,003 83,822
Output Tokens 8,340 72,040
Reasoning Tokens 355,649 292,615
Response Time (avg) 30.84s 69.86s
Response Time (max) 196.03s 599.43s
Response Time (total) 647.67s 1536.98s
Parameters ~1T total (~50B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#52 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

#55 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039
GLM 5.2 6.4 8.6 33.3% 0 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair