Navigate
Advertise here

Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.4 vs 8.4. Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.585 vs $4.016. Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh) is faster at 97.70s vs 120.40s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 73.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-11-10

Compared models

Rank
#106
Total Output Tokens
415,435
Response Time (avg)
97.70s
Total Cost
$0.585
Rank
#104
Total Output Tokens
424,019
Response Time (avg)
120.40s
Total Cost
$4.016
Recommended model Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh)

It has the best score here (8.4), while costing about 6.9x less than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh Release: 2026-08-11 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low Release: 2026-08-12
Score 8.4 8.4
Rank #106 #104
Reliability 9.9 9.6
Consistency 8.6 9.2
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.0% 73.9%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 5.170 19.825
Total Cost $0.585 $4.016
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.040 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 287,538 313,881
Output Tokens 118,266 123,706
Reasoning Tokens 346,758 388,328
Response Time (avg) 97.70s 120.40s
Response Time (max) 576.79s 534.21s
Response Time (total) 2247.18s 2769.16s
Parameters 30B 2.4T total (95B active)
Availability Open source Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#106 Muse Glimmer 30B

xhigh
Cost
$0.007
Time
94.6s
Tokens
4,318 tok

#104 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

low
Cost
$0.100
Time
193.2s
Tokens
16,767 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 105.91s 7,428 18,697 63,334
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 7.8 9.3 66.7% 0 172.53s 6,716 21,405 57,399

Switch Comparison Pair