Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.4 vs 8.4. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.349 vs $0.585. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (high) is faster at 49.88s vs 97.70s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 82.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-16

Compared models

Rank
#84
Total Output Tokens
415,435
Response Time (avg)
97.70s
Total Cost
$0.585
Rank
#81
Total Output Tokens
608,283
Response Time (avg)
49.88s
Total Cost
$0.349
Recommended model Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (high)

It has the best score here (8.4), while costing about 1.7x less than Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh Release: 2026-08-11 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL Nemotron 3.5 Super VL high Release: 2026-10-15 Free Available
Score 8.4 8.4
Rank #84 #81
Reliability 9.9 9.9
Consistency 8.6 8.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.0% 82.6%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 5.170 2.324
Total Cost $0.585 $0.349
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.040 / 1M $0.020 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 287,538 296,001
Output Tokens 118,266 8,105
Reasoning Tokens 346,758 600,178
Response Time (avg) 97.70s 49.88s
Response Time (max) 576.79s 310.51s
Response Time (total) 2247.18s 1147.24s
Parameters 30B 120B total (12B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#84 Muse Glimmer 30B

xhigh
Cost
$0.007
Time
94.6s
Tokens
4,318 tok

#81 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
25.6s
Tokens
9,076 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 105.91s 7,428 18,697 63,334
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 59.18s 7,623 352 133,374

Switch Comparison Pair