Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh) vs GPT-5.2 (medium)

GPT-5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.2. Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.632 vs $0.951. GPT-5.2 (medium) is faster at 22.62s vs 94.47s, with pass rates of 75.8% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-12

Rank
#44
Total Output Tokens
455,790
Response Time (avg)
94.47s
Total Cost
$0.632
Rank
#36
Total Output Tokens
54,782
Response Time (avg)
22.62s
Total Cost
$0.951
Recommended model GPT-5.2 (medium)

It has the best score here (8.4), while responding about 4.2x faster than Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh Release: 2026-08-11 GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 medium Release: 2025-12-11
Score 8.2 8.4
Rank #44 #36
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.3 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.8% 72.7%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.509 6.791
Total Cost $0.632 $0.951
Input Price $0.350 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 110,918 105,004
Output Tokens 126,922 9,914
Reasoning Tokens 328,868 44,868
Response Time (avg) 94.47s 22.62s
Response Time (max) 576.79s 102.93s
Response Time (total) 2078.31s 339.28s
Parameters 30B ~1.2T total (~80B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#44 Muse Glimmer 30B

xhigh
Cost
$0.007
Time
94.6s
Tokens
4,318 tok

#36 GPT-5.2

medium
Cost
$0.047
Time
49.2s
Tokens
3,396 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 105.91s 7,428 18,697 63,334
GPT-5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.73s 7,302 511 11,912

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair