Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Muse Glimmer 30B (low) vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Muse Glimmer 30B (low) leads on average score with 7.1 vs 7.0. Muse Glimmer 30B (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.187 vs $0.524. GPT-5.6 Sol is faster at 2.17s vs 18.64s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#111
Total Output Tokens
95,970
Response Time (avg)
18.64s
Total Cost
$0.187
Rank
#115
Total Output Tokens
4,357
Response Time (avg)
2.17s
Total Cost
$0.524
Recommended model GPT-5.6 Sol

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.0 vs 7.1), while responding about 8.6x faster than Muse Glimmer 30B (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B low Release: 2026-08-11 GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol none Release: 2026-07-09
Score 7.1 7.0
Rank #111 #115
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.692 4.365
Total Cost $0.187 $0.524
Input Price $0.350 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $30.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 130,312 78,602
Output Tokens 33,867 4,357
Reasoning Tokens 62,103 0
Response Time (avg) 18.64s 2.17s
Response Time (max) 234.92s 12.81s
Response Time (total) 410.18s 47.66s
Parameters 30B ~2T total (~150B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 Muse Glimmer 30B

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
13.5s
Tokens
953 tok

#115 GPT-5.6 Sol

none
Cost
$0.116
Time
78.7s
Tokens
3,944 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.1 9.9 66.7% 0 16.52s 7,419 2,759 10,173
GPT-5.6 Sol 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,302 390 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair