Navigate
Advertise here

Muse Glimmer 30B (high) vs GPT-6 Sol

The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.2. GPT-6 Sol has the lower benchmark cost at $0.280 vs $0.430. GPT-6 Sol is faster at 6.84s vs 66.70s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-23

Compared models

Rank
#147
Total Output Tokens
370,806
Response Time (avg)
66.70s
Total Cost
$0.430
Rank
#148
Total Output Tokens
6,696
Response Time (avg)
6.84s
Total Cost
$0.280
Recommended model GPT-6 Sol

It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 1.5x less than Muse Glimmer 30B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B high Release: 2026-08-11 GPT-6 Sol GPT-6 Sol none Release: 2026-09-23
Score 7.2 7.2
Rank #147 #148
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.2 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 66.7%
Flaky tests 8 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.349 2.151
Total Cost $0.430 $0.280
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $10.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 103,494 106,332
Output Tokens 100,589 6,696
Reasoning Tokens 270,217 0
Response Time (avg) 66.70s 6.84s
Response Time (max) 451.90s 23.89s
Response Time (total) 1467.39s 150.43s
Parameters 30B ~2T total (~150B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#147 Muse Glimmer 30B

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
61.7s
Tokens
3,097 tok

#148 GPT-6 Sol

none
Cost
$0.030
Time
31.9s
Tokens
3,055 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 95.97s 7,419 16,128 55,433
GPT-6 Sol 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 12.23s 7,302 389 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair