Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Muse Glimmer 30B (high) vs Muse Wonder (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. Muse Glimmer 30B (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.506 vs $3.426. Muse Wonder (high) is faster at 22.96s vs 69.87s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-13

Compared models

Rank
#124
Total Output Tokens
350,370
Response Time (avg)
69.87s
Total Cost
$0.506
Rank
#122
Total Output Tokens
152,440
Response Time (avg)
22.96s
Total Cost
$3.426
Recommended model Muse Glimmer 30B (high)

It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 6.8x less than Muse Wonder (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B high Release: 2026-08-11 Muse Wonder Muse Wonder high Release: 2026-10-13
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #124 #122
Reliability 10.0 9.3
Consistency 7.3 9.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 66.7%
Flaky tests 8 1
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 5.675 22.837
Total Cost $0.506 $3.426
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $4.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $20.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.040 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 281,859 94,153
Output Tokens 102,526 9,606
Reasoning Tokens 286,217 142,834
Response Time (avg) 69.87s 22.96s
Response Time (max) 451.90s 143.21s
Response Time (total) 1607.12s 528.08s
Parameters 30B ~1T total (~50B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#124 Muse Glimmer 30B

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
61.7s
Tokens
3,097 tok

#122 Muse Wonder

high
Cost
$0.199
Time
113.0s
Tokens
10,002 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 95.97s 7,419 16,128 55,433
Muse Wonder 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 36.94s 7,401 1,392 35,716

Switch Comparison Pair