Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Xing4.0 29b A4b

Ling 3.1 Flash leads on average score with 5.5 vs 3.3. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Ling 3.1 Flash is faster at 15.75s vs 42.72s, with pass rates of 33.3% vs 7.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-17

Compared models

Rank
#308
Total Output Tokens
85,777
Response Time (avg)
15.75s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#412
Total Output Tokens
26,540
Response Time (avg)
42.72s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Ling 3.1 Flash

It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 2.7x faster than Xing4.0 29b A4b.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash none Release: 2026-10-03 Xing4.0 29b A4b Xing4.0 29b A4b none Release: 2026-10-17 Free Available
Score 5.5 3.3
Rank #308 #412
Reliability 9.8 8.8
Consistency 8.4 8.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 33.3% 7.3%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.000 $0.000
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 286,758 153,665
Output Tokens 85,777 26,540
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 15.75s 42.72s
Response Time (max) 90.95s 634.11s
Response Time (total) 362.23s 982.66s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) 29B total (4B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#308 Ling 3.1 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
171.4s
Tokens
20,178 tok

#412 Xing4.0 29b A4b

none
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 4.5 7.5 22.2% 1 31.85s 8,307 27,810 0
Xing4.0 29b A4b 3.6 9.7 0.0% 0 231.73s 8,622 22,915 0

Switch Comparison Pair