Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.3 vs 8.2. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.417. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 26.88s vs 88.74s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 81.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-03

Compared models

Rank
#81
Total Output Tokens
648,854
Response Time (avg)
88.74s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#84
Total Output Tokens
81,020
Response Time (avg)
26.88s
Total Cost
$0.417
Recommended model GLM 5.2 (medium)

It has the best score here (8.2), while responding about 3.3x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium Release: 2026-10-03 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.3 8.2
Rank #81 #84
Reliability 9.6 9.6
Consistency 8.8 8.1
Attempts 69/69 66/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.0% 81.2%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 69 66
Cost per result 0.000 2.890
Total Cost $0.000 $0.417
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.410 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $3.990 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.260 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 369,495 227,164
Output Tokens 172,852 20,029
Reasoning Tokens 476,002 60,991
Response Time (avg) 88.74s 26.88s
Response Time (max) 567.88s 102.40s
Response Time (total) 2041.10s 591.34s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#81 Ling 3.1 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.000
Time
101.1s
Tokens
11,607 tok

#84 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 87.15s 8,298 19,577 62,002
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair