Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) vs Xing4.0 29b A4b (medium)

Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 8.3 vs 3.7. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) is faster at 88.74s vs 371.69s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 26.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-17

Compared models

Rank
#96
Total Output Tokens
571,666
Response Time (avg)
88.74s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#398
Total Output Tokens
107,980
Response Time (avg)
371.69s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Ling 3.1 Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (8.3), while responding about 4.2x faster than Xing4.0 29b A4b (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium Release: 2026-10-03 Xing4.0 29b A4b Xing4.0 29b A4b medium Release: 2026-10-17 Free Available
Score 8.3 3.7
Rank #96 #398
Reliability 9.6 7.3
Consistency 8.8 6.2
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.0% 26.1%
Flaky tests 3 11
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.000 $0.000
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 369,495 98,467
Output Tokens 172,852 3,385
Reasoning Tokens 476,002 104,595
Response Time (avg) 88.74s 371.69s
Response Time (max) 567.88s 971.85s
Response Time (total) 2041.10s 8548.88s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) 29B total (4B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 Ling 3.1 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.000
Time
101.1s
Tokens
11,607 tok

#398 Xing4.0 29b A4b

medium
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 87.15s 8,298 19,577 62,002
Xing4.0 29b A4b 4.2 5.1 33.3% 2 798.00s 1,889 502 27,115

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Ling 3.0 TinyhighvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableGemini 4 ArgonlowvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highLing 3.0 TinylowvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3maxGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumClaude Haiku 5.5highvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailablevsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2highGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinydefaultvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree Available