- Rank
- #81
- Total Output Tokens
- 648,854
- Response Time (avg)
- 88.74s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) vs MiniMax M2.5 (medium)
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 8.3 vs 4.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.440. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) is faster at 88.74s vs 102.32s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 42.0%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #348
- Total Output Tokens
- 290,496
- Response Time (avg)
- 102.32s
- Total Cost
- $0.440
Recommended model
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium | MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.3 | 4.3 |
| Rank | #81 | #348 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Consistency | 8.8 | 6.8 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.0% | 42.0% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 9 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 7.104 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.440 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.270 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $1.080 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | $0.027 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 369,495 | 188,239 |
| Output Tokens | 172,852 | 27,822 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 476,002 | 262,674 |
| Response Time (avg) | 88.74s | 102.32s |
| Response Time (max) | 567.88s | 600.81s |
| Response Time (total) | 2041.10s | 1637.05s |
| Parameters | 560B total (25B active) | 230B total (10B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Weights available |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#81 Ling 3.1 Flash
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 101.1s
- Tokens
- 11,607 tok
#348 MiniMax M2.5
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 100.10s | 233,792 | 12,506 | 12,249 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 600.81s | 45,618 | 7,413 | 10,854 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.24s | 750 | 1,152 | 3,396 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7.9 | 6.3 | 83.3% | 2 | 20.82s | 612 | 286 | 45,344 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 87.15s | 8,298 | 19,577 | 62,002 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.4 | 9.1 | 0.0% | 0 | 188.58s | 6,076 | 357 | 106,177 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 306.46s | 106,402 | 26,806 | 100,471 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 50.0% | 2 | 83.19s | 119,959 | 16,687 | 18,834 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.92s | 8,016 | 1,334 | 3,754 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 66.7% | 2 | 7.48s | 6,584 | 266 | 3,835 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 262.25s | 837 | 100,307 | 228,869 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 158.88s | 368 | 14 | 45,372 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.28s | 546 | 152 | 1,820 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 1 | 6.63s | 492 | 25 | 1,686 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.57s | 744 | 323 | 1,317 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 621ms | 699 | 156 | 1,495 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 42.32s | 747 | 5,455 | 40,080 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 11.21s | 495 | 1,069 | 9,605 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 47.17s | 9,135 | 3,850 | 12,018 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.35s | 7,123 | 269 | 937 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32.55s | 228 | 1,390 | 10,026 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 80.79s | 213 | 1,280 | 18,535 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 3.1 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3maxGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighMercury 2nonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumMiniMax M2.5mediumvsgpt-oss-120bnoneSeed-2.0-CodelowvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumGranite 4.2 8BnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsMuse Spark 1.1highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsInklinghighFree Available