Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.1 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium)

Ling 3.1 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.7. Ling 3.1 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.435. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) is faster at 54.06s vs 87.39s, with pass rates of 69.6% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#106
Total Output Tokens
687,692
Response Time (avg)
87.39s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#116
Total Output Tokens
200,348
Response Time (avg)
54.06s
Total Cost
$0.435
Recommended model Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.9), while responding about 1.6x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash high Release: 2026-10-03 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.9 7.7
Rank #106 #116
Reliability 9.8 9.7
Consistency 9.3 9.1
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 3.481
Total Cost $0.000 $0.435
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A $0.375 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 324,691 176,539
Output Tokens 181,251 4,419
Reasoning Tokens 506,441 195,929
Response Time (avg) 87.39s 54.06s
Response Time (max) 665.85s 203.01s
Response Time (total) 2010.08s 1189.36s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#106 Ling 3.1 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
181.1s
Tokens
21,073 tok

#116 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
76.7s
Tokens
4,355 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 83.41s 8,298 17,470 54,626
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 6.2 8.7 33.3% 0 125.25s 7,630 308 58,682

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair