- Rank
- #356
- Total Output Tokens
- 923,276
- Response Time (avg)
- 64.99s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) vs Tev1 4B Experimental
Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) leads on average score with 3.6 vs 1.0. Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.002. Tev1 4B Experimental is faster at 498ms vs 64.99s, with pass rates of 23.2% vs 13.0%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #381
- Total Output Tokens
- 96
- Response Time (avg)
- 498ms
- Total Cost
- $0.002
Recommended model
Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (3.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Tev1 4B Experimental Tev1 4B Experimental none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.6 | 1.0 |
| Rank | #356 | #381 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.9 | 3.0 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 21/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 23.2% | 13.0% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 0 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 21 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.048 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.002 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.042 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 103,898 | 33,864 |
| Output Tokens | 148,304 | 96 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 774,972 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 64.99s | 498ms |
| Response Time (max) | 262.20s | 602ms |
| Response Time (total) | 1429.68s | 3.49s |
| Parameters | 7.9B total (1.3B active) | 4B |
| Availability | Open source | Weights available |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#356 Ling 3.0 Tiny
medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 177.4s
- Tokens
- 6,873 tok
#381 Together: Tev1 4B Experimental
none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
- Cost
- N/A
- Time
- -
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 24ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 23.73s | 750 | 5,103 | 94,884 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 2.5 | 2.5 | 25.0% | 0 | 602ms | 507 | 6 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.9 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 211.99s | 7,948 | 70,838 | 206,006 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 139.78s | 76,108 | 17,871 | 126,497 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.7 | 5.7 | 16.7% | 1 | 4.41s | 8,016 | 2,014 | 6,755 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 509ms | 25,317 | 30 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 81.40s | 637 | 21,709 | 187,100 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 6.7 | 6.7 | 66.7% | 0 | 440ms | 1,086 | 12 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.8 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 1 | 31.77s | 546 | 4,275 | 30,975 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.8 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 3.00s | 744 | 610 | 1,436 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 555ms | 6,411 | 42 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 34.65s | 747 | 15,561 | 85,029 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 1.7 | 3.3 | 0.0% | 0 | 432ms | 543 | 6 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.91s | 8,226 | 380 | 708 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 100.96s | 176 | 9,943 | 35,582 | |
| Tev1 4B Experimental | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 3.0 TinymediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bnonevsLing 3.0 TinymediumLing 3.0 TinymediumvsGrok 4.20noneMercury 2.5nonevsLing 3.0 TinymediumCommand A+highvsLing 3.0 TinymediumLing 3.0 Tinymediumvsgpt-oss-120bnoneCommand A+nonevsLing 3.0 TinymediumCommand A+lowvsLing 3.0 TinymediumMercury 2nonevsLing 3.0 TinymediumGranite 4.2 8BnonevsLing 3.0 TinymediumTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsLing 3.0 TinymediumLing 3.0 TinymediumvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5none