Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads on average score with 5.5 vs 3.6. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Ling 3.1 Flash is faster at 15.75s vs 64.99s, with pass rates of 23.2% vs 33.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-24

Compared models

Rank
#413
Total Output Tokens
911,748
Response Time (avg)
64.99s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#320
Total Output Tokens
85,777
Response Time (avg)
15.75s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Ling 3.1 Flash

It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 4.1x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny medium Release: 2026-08-07 Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash none Release: 2026-10-03
Score 3.6 5.5
Rank #413 #320
Reliability 9.6 9.8
Consistency 8.9 8.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 23.2% 33.3%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.000 $0.000
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 103,898 286,758
Output Tokens 148,304 85,777
Reasoning Tokens 774,972 0
Response Time (avg) 64.99s 15.75s
Response Time (max) 262.20s 90.95s
Response Time (total) 1429.68s 362.23s
Parameters 7.9B total (1.3B active) 560B total (25B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#413 Ling 3.0 Tiny

medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
177.4s
Tokens
6,873 tok

#320 Ling 3.1 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
171.4s
Tokens
20,178 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 211.99s 7,948 70,838 206,006
Ling 3.1 Flash 4.5 7.5 22.2% 1 31.85s 8,307 27,810 0

Switch Comparison Pair