Navigate
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) vs gpt-oss-120b

gpt-oss-120b leads on average score with 4.2 vs 3.7. Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.016. gpt-oss-120b is faster at 28.63s vs 63.15s, with pass rates of 18.8% vs 34.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-11-10

Compared models

Rank
#442
Total Output Tokens
868,004
Response Time (avg)
63.15s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#427
Total Output Tokens
62,213
Response Time (avg)
28.63s
Total Cost
$0.016
Recommended model gpt-oss-120b

It has the best score here (4.2), while responding about 2.2x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny low Release: 2026-08-07 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b none Release: 2025-08-05
Score 3.7 4.2
Rank #442 #427
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 9.7 7.6
Attempts 69/69 60/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.8% 34.8%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 69 60
Cost per result 0.000 0.274
Total Cost $0.000 $0.016
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.037 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.170 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 99,662 131,652
Output Tokens 146,555 16,869
Reasoning Tokens 732,977 53,081
Response Time (avg) 63.15s 28.63s
Response Time (max) 252.08s 140.90s
Response Time (total) 1389.35s 486.69s
Parameters 7.9B total (1.3B active) 117B total (5.1B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#442 Ling 3.0 Tiny

low
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
200.0s
Tokens
5,030 tok

#427 gpt-oss-120b

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 170.73s 7,619 56,012 170,220
gpt-oss-120b 1.5 0.4 22.2% 1 9.57s 901 204 3,028

Switch Comparison Pair