Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) vs gpt-oss-120b

Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) leads on average score with 3.8 vs 3.7. Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.033. gpt-oss-120b is faster at 21.61s vs 66.16s, with pass rates of 19.7% vs 33.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-22

Compared models

Rank
#333
Total Output Tokens
879,532
Response Time (avg)
66.16s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#338
Total Output Tokens
51,664
Response Time (avg)
21.61s
Total Cost
$0.033
Recommended model gpt-oss-120b

Its score stays close to the best score here (3.7 vs 3.8), while responding about 3.1x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny low Release: 2026-08-07 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b none Release: 2025-08-05 Free Available
Score 3.8 3.7
Rank #333 #338
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 9.7 7.8
Attempts 66/66 57/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 19.7% 33.3%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 57
Cost per result 0.000 0.168
Total Cost $0.000 $0.033
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 99,662 9,081
Output Tokens 146,555 51,664
Reasoning Tokens 732,977 0
Response Time (avg) 66.16s 21.61s
Response Time (max) 252.08s 113.71s
Response Time (total) 1389.33s 345.79s
Parameters 7.9B total (1.3B active) 117B total (5.1B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#333 Ling 3.0 Tiny

low
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
200.0s
Tokens
5,030 tok

#338 gpt-oss-120b

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 170.73s 7,619 56,012 170,220
gpt-oss-120b 1.5 4.0 22.2% 1 9.57s 901 3,232 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair