Navigate
Advertise here

Mercury 2.5 (medium) vs LongCat 2.0

The average score is effectively tied at 6.4 vs 6.4. Mercury 2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.034 vs $0.104. Mercury 2.5 (medium) is faster at 7.74s vs 8.50s, with pass rates of 63.8% vs 42.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#206
Total Output Tokens
138,946
Response Time (avg)
7.74s
Total Cost
$0.034
Rank
#211
Total Output Tokens
17,473
Response Time (avg)
8.50s
Total Cost
$0.104
Recommended model Mercury 2.5 (medium)

It has the best score here (6.4), while costing about 3.1x less than LongCat 2.0.

Detailed comparison

Metric Mercury 2.5 Mercury 2.5 medium Release: 2026-09-08 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.4 6.4
Rank #206 #211
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 8.3 9.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.8% 42.0%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.280 1.298
Total Cost $0.034 $0.104
Input Price $0.040 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 317,982 276,199
Output Tokens 3,918 17,473
Reasoning Tokens 135,028 0
Response Time (avg) 7.74s 8.50s
Response Time (max) 107.89s 81.77s
Response Time (total) 178.07s 195.60s
Parameters ~100B 1.6T total (48B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#206 Mercury 2.5

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.8s
Tokens
3,386 tok

#211 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2.5 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 3.70s 7,807 488 21,857
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair