Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Granite 4.2 8B — high vs none

high leads on average score with 4.6 vs 4.3. none has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.084. none is faster at 86.27s vs 235.89s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 16.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-02

Rank
#276
Total Output Tokens
612,215
Response Time (avg)
235.89s
Total Cost
$0.084
Rank
#285
Total Output Tokens
130,805
Response Time (avg)
86.27s
Total Cost
$0.026
Recommended model none

Its score stays close to the best score here (4.3 vs 4.6), while costing about 3.3x less than Granite 4.2 8B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B high Release: 2026-09-02 Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B none Release: 2026-09-02
Score 4.6 4.3
Rank #276 #285
Reliability 7.6 8.6
Consistency 6.3 9.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 16.7%
Flaky tests 10 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.085 0.847
Total Cost $0.084 $0.026
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 43,278 57,786
Output Tokens 181,083 130,805
Reasoning Tokens 431,132 0
Response Time (avg) 235.89s 86.27s
Response Time (max) 685.87s 747.17s
Response Time (total) 5189.64s 1897.96s
Parameters 8B 8B
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#276 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B

high
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.2s
Tokens
0 tok

#285 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B

none
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.2s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Granite 4.2 8B 3.8 4.3 33.3% 2 515.34s 7,047 42,438 154,749
Granite 4.2 8B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 105.60s 8,358 47,944 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair