- Rank
- #159
- Total Output Tokens
- 253,646
- Response Time (avg)
- 104.93s
- Total Cost
- $0.092
Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium) vs Mercury 2.5 (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 6.8 vs 6.8. Mercury 2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.022 vs $0.092. Mercury 2.5 (medium) is faster at 3.19s vs 104.93s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 65.2%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #157
- Total Output Tokens
- 120,129
- Response Time (avg)
- 3.19s
- Total Cost
- $0.022
Recommended model
Mercury 2.5 (medium)
It has the best score here (6.8), while costing about 4.2x less than Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B medium Free Available | Mercury 2.5 Mercury 2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Rank | #159 | #157 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.8 |
| Consistency | 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 69.7% | 65.2% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.623 | 0.181 |
| Total Cost | $0.092 | $0.022 |
| Input Price | $0.070 / 1M | $0.040 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.340 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 77,528 | 91,402 |
| Output Tokens | 26,048 | 3,138 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 227,598 | 116,991 |
| Response Time (avg) | 104.93s | 3.19s |
| Response Time (max) | 912.19s | 9.87s |
| Response Time (total) | 2203.52s | 70.18s |
| Parameters | 25.2B total (3.8B active) | ~100B |
| Availability | Open source | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#159 Gemma 4 26B A4B
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#157 Mercury 2.5
medium- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 3.8s
- Tokens
- 3,386 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.20s | 816 | 1,142 | 3,045 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.28s | 773 | 192 | 7,122 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 2.9 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 272.54s | 5,062 | 14,838 | 44,567 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 44.5% | 2 | 3.70s | 7,807 | 488 | 21,857 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 492.87s | 54,390 | 5,451 | 132,113 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 9.23s | 62,336 | 1,073 | 34,370 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 16.51s | 8,334 | 1,567 | 2,827 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.57s | 8,385 | 582 | 9,343 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 35.14s | 494 | 481 | 15,212 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 4.39s | 852 | 59 | 19,837 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 29.76s | 567 | 25 | 5,075 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 4.4 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.60s | 528 | 98 | 2,364 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 17.54s | 777 | 887 | 4,470 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 6.4 | 6.0 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.07s | 520 | 55 | 2,344 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.79s | 801 | 410 | 2,128 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.93s | 766 | 290 | 7,721 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.01s | 6,096 | 450 | 1,256 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.35s | 9,203 | 269 | 4,641 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 180.87s | 191 | 797 | 16,905 | |
| Mercury 2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.30s | 232 | 32 | 7,392 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsMercury 2.5mediumMercury 2.5mediumvsGLM 5.3lowGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.2noneGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.3lowMercury 2.5mediumvsGLM 5.2noneGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5noneMercury 2.5mediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5noneDeepSeek V4 PrononevsMercury 2.5mediumDeepSeek V4 PrononevsGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailableGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsLongCat 2.0lowMercury 2.5mediumvsSolar Pro 4lowMercury 2.5mediumvsLongCat 2.0low