Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Summary

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) leads on average score with 9.6 vs 5.9. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.012 vs $0.667. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is faster at 3.37s vs 18.64s, with pass rates of 98.4% vs 42.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3 Flash Preview (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Release: 2025-12-17 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 9.6 5.9
Rank #2 #127
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.4% 42.9%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.335 0.230
Total Cost $0.667 $0.012
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,017 48,194
Output Tokens 2,006 4,343
Reasoning Tokens 214,153 0
Response Time (avg) 18.64s 3.37s
Response Time (max) 117.26s 47.43s
Response Time (total) 391.35s 70.75s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3 Flash Preview

medium
Cost
$0.010
Time
17.9s
Tokens
3,236 tok

#127 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
28.4s
Tokens
4,518 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 84.40s 8,122 462 161,084
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,808 571 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair