- Rank
- #26
- Total Output Tokens
- 38,453
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s
- Total Cost
- $0.183
Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high)
Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) leads on average score with 9.4 vs 7.9. Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.183 vs $2.949. Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 6.24s vs 120.88s, with pass rates of 95.7% vs 75.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #122
- Total Output Tokens
- 368,836
- Response Time (avg)
- 120.88s
- Total Cost
- $2.949
Recommended model
Gemini 3.7 Flash (low)
It has the best score here (9.4), while costing about 16.2x less than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Gemini 3.7 Flash Gemini 3.7 Flash low | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.4 | 7.9 |
| Rank | #26 | #122 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 95.7% | 75.4% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.868 | 18.696 |
| Total Cost | $0.183 | $2.949 |
| Input Price | $0.750 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $3.750 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | $0.075 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | $0.042 / 1M | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 188,519 | 295,642 |
| Output Tokens | 7,694 | 115,041 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 30,759 | 353,398 |
| Response Time (avg) | 6.24s | 120.88s |
| Response Time (max) | 58.75s | 532.28s |
| Response Time (total) | 143.56s | 2780.16s |
| Parameters | ~500B total (~20B active) | 2.4T total (95B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Weights available |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#26 Gemini 3.7 Flash
low- Cost
- $0.010
- Time
- 23.5s
- Tokens
- 5,210 tok
#122 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 600.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 58.75s | 98,197 | 1,400 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 127.11s | 186,711 | 2,240 | 10,171 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.54s | 492 | 99 | 1,398 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 24.22s | 1,128 | 305 | 4,864 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 7.6 | 7.2 | 77.8% | 1 | 6.20s | 8,118 | 461 | 11,508 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 5.9 | 6.3 | 55.6% | 1 | 160.52s | 6,399 | 3,310 | 48,078 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.00s | 66,250 | 4,873 | 8,108 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 6.9 | 5.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 266.12s | 81,205 | 7,791 | 41,921 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.15s | 7,548 | 278 | 1,093 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.67s | 7,928 | 550 | 2,307 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 3.09s | 642 | 12 | 3,029 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 4.1 | 6.5 | 22.2% | 1 | 301.08s | 964 | 11,279 | 139,028 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.76s | 486 | 81 | 1,043 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 11.38s | 630 | 2,020 | 2,165 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.47s | 615 | 72 | 1,778 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.45s | 927 | 245 | 1,727 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.92s | 558 | 166 | 1,580 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 65.54s | 989 | 698 | 15,073 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.10s | 5,457 | 241 | 160 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 32.93s | 8,481 | 302 | 656 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.92s | 156 | 11 | 1,062 | |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 347.95s | 280 | 86,301 | 87,408 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighClaude Opus 5highvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumClaude Opus 5mediumvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowMuse WondermaxvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighClaude Opus 5.5highvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.5mediumGPT-5.4 MinimediumvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.6mediumQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxGPT-5.6 TerralowvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95Bhigh