Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.6 Flash (low) vs Qwen3.8 Max (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.7 vs 8.7. Gemini 3.6 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.501 vs $0.687. Gemini 3.6 Flash (low) is faster at 4.93s vs 21.19s, with pass rates of 87.9% vs 84.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-04

Rank
#21
Total Output Tokens
49,499
Response Time (avg)
4.93s
Total Cost
$0.501
Rank
#23
Total Output Tokens
81,411
Response Time (avg)
21.19s
Total Cost
$0.687
Recommended model Gemini 3.6 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 4.3x faster than Qwen3.8 Max (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.6 Flash low Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3.8 Max low Release: 2026-08-04
Score 8.7 8.7
Rank #21 #23
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.0
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 87.9% 84.9%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.779 4.041
Total Cost $0.501 $0.687
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $7.500 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 85,881 99,172
Output Tokens 5,489 6,132
Reasoning Tokens 44,010 75,279
Response Time (avg) 4.93s 21.19s
Response Time (max) 30.83s 155.75s
Response Time (total) 108.48s 466.14s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#21 Gemini 3.6 Flash

low
Cost
$0.045
Time
25.0s
Tokens
6,054 tok

#23 Qwen3.8 Max

low
Cost
$0.026
Time
68.5s
Tokens
4,280 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 6.95s 8,126 466 12,253
Qwen3.8 Max 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 28.69s 8,127 512 15,952

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair