Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) leads on average score with 8.1 vs 7.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.584 vs $0.676. GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) is faster at 7.11s vs 9.48s, with pass rates of 81.8% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Release: 2026-07-21 GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra medium Release: 2026-07-09
Score 8.1 7.8
Rank #31 #43
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.8% 69.7%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.169 4.825
Total Cost $0.584 $0.676
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $15.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,138 79,175
Output Tokens 8,315 4,878
Reasoning Tokens 212,507 26,952
Response Time (avg) 9.48s 7.11s
Response Time (max) 43.93s 41.68s
Response Time (total) 208.52s 156.42s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
23.6s
Tokens
9,128 tok

#43 GPT-5.6 Terra

medium
Cost
$0.035
Time
16.3s
Tokens
2,418 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.1 7.2 55.6% 1 7.19s 7,302 427 4,527

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair