- Rank
- #11
- Total Output Tokens
- 205,482
- Response Time (avg)
- 15.46s
- Total Cost
- $2.011
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low)
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.4 vs 9.1. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.664 vs $2.011. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.46s vs 24.21s, with pass rates of 89.4% vs 86.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #23
- Total Output Tokens
- 75,865
- Response Time (avg)
- 24.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.664
Recommended model
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low)
Its score stays close to the best score here (9.1 vs 9.4), while costing about 3.0x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Rank | #11 | #23 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 89.4% | 86.4% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 10.580 | 3.684 |
| Total Cost | $2.011 | $0.664 |
| Input Price | $1.500 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $9.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 107,146 | 103,954 |
| Output Tokens | 8,777 | 6,322 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 196,705 | 69,543 |
| Response Time (avg) | 15.46s | 24.21s |
| Response Time (max) | 145.92s | 207.79s |
| Response Time (total) | 340.20s | 532.62s |
| Parameters | ~500B total (~20B active) | 2.4T total (~100B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#11 Gemini 3.5 Flash
high- Cost
- $0.208
- Time
- 118.2s
- Tokens
- 23,158 tok
#23 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
low- Cost
- $0.014
- Time
- 41.2s
- Tokens
- 2,421 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.57s | 492 | 174 | 4,997 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.72s | 984 | 212 | 1,854 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 22.96s | 8,118 | 456 | 47,129 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 37.42s | 8,127 | 485 | 17,404 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 8.2 | 6.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 84.14s | 82,416 | 7,153 | 93,585 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 113.88s | 74,767 | 4,562 | 29,335 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.43s | 7,548 | 279 | 8,466 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.94s | 7,938 | 261 | 2,254 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 16.99s | 642 | 12 | 28,526 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 34.93s | 1,014 | 45 | 13,881 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.63s | 486 | 115 | 1,650 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 8.91s | 594 | 120 | 820 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.35s | 615 | 70 | 3,799 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.32s | 855 | 90 | 866 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.23s | 558 | 241 | 4,940 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.49s | 930 | 275 | 1,248 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.96s | 6,115 | 265 | 1,608 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.73s | 8,463 | 249 | 126 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.94s | 156 | 12 | 2,005 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 13.28s | 282 | 23 | 1,755 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3.8 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGPT-5.6 SolmediumGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGPT-6 AstramediumGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGPT-6 AstralowGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGPT-5.5lowClaude Opus 5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5highvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGPT-5.6 SollowGPT-5.5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)low