Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 8.2 vs 8.0. Step 3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.515 vs $0.643. Gemini 2.5 Flash (medium) is faster at 21.18s vs 26.37s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 72.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 2.5 Flash (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Release: 2025-06-17 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-29
Score 8.2 8.0
Rank #25 #28
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 72.7%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 64
Cost per result 4.286 3.676
Total Cost $0.643 $0.515
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 132,498 114,062
Output Tokens 12,739 427,572
Reasoning Tokens 228,464 0
Response Time (avg) 21.18s 26.37s
Response Time (max) 140.50s 152.83s
Response Time (total) 465.89s 580.25s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#25 Gemini 2.5 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
274.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#28 Step 3.7 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
46.2s
Tokens
4,466 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 41.01s 6,669 543 32,303
Step 3.7 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 27.42s 7,437 44,797 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair